|
Acupuncture and Good Prognosis IVF Patients: Synergy.
P. C. Magarelli, D. K. Cridennda, M. Cohen. Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Center, Colorado Springs, CO; East Winds Acupuncture, Inc., Colorado Springs, CO.
FERTILITY AND STERILITY®, Proceedings from the 2004 ASRM meeting in Philadelphia
OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of electro stimulation acupuncture
and traditional combined with auricular acupuncture on IVF outcomes in
good prognosis patients.
DESIGN: Retrospective case controlled clinical study. Acupuncture Consortium
for treatment standardization. Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility
IVF Private Practice and Traditional Chinese Medicine Acupuncture
Clinics.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fourteen infertile patients
undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with gonadotropins and
GnRH agonist and antagonist for IVF-ET (2001 to 2003) in private practice
IVF clinic. Only IVF patients with normal Day 3 FSH, normal uterine artery
pulsatility indices, sperm morphologies over 7% normal by Kruger Strict
Criteria and good response to ovarian hyperstimulation protocols (i.e., E2
over 2000 pg/ml) were analyzed.Intervention (s): Electrostimulation acupuncture
– reduction of Pulsatility Index (PI) of the uterine artery and
Traditional combined with Auricular acupuncture – Pre/Post embryo transfer
protocols were used alone or in combination and resultant pregnancy
outcomes were measured after IVF treatments. Main Outcome Measure(s):
Cycles were grouped according to those that received No Acupuncture
(Non-Ac) and those that received either one or both acupuncture treatments
(Ac). Comparisons were made between Acupuncture treated IVF patients
and Non–Acupuncture treated IVF patients in clinical pregnancies,
ongoing pregnancies and birth outcomes. The statistics used for this analysis
included; Tests for normal distribution: chi-square test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Test Unpaired T-tests Stepwise Multiple regression Variance ratio test
(F-Test) One-Way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Student-Newman-
Keuls (SNK) test for pair wise comparison of subgroups.
RESULTS: Total IVF cases 114, 53 with Acupuncture (Ac) and 61
without Acupuncture (Non-Ac). Demographics, Infertility Diagnoses, and
Treatment Protocols were statistically the same between both groups and by
design, the following parameters were similar: Sperm Morphology; Peak
Day 3 FSH; Average Pulsatility Index; Peak E2 at hCG; and Post hCG P4.
These parameters earned the designation of Good Prognosis group. Preg-
S80 Abstracts Vol. 82, Suppl. 2, September 2004
nancy rates (PR) and Miscarriage rates (SAB) were statistically improved at
the p < 0.05 levels in those patients that received Acupuncture (51% v 36%
PR and 8% v 20% SAB in the AC v Non-Ac groups). There were no ectopic
pregnancies in the Ac group and 9% in the Non-Ac group, p < 0.008.
Finally, Birth rates (BR) per cycle start and per pregnancy were significantly
higher in the Ac group, with 23% more births/pregnancy significant at the
p < 0.05 level.
CONCLUSION: The use of adjunctive therapies in IVF protocols is
gaining popularity. In previously published data, Acupuncture was reserved
for Poorer Prognosis patients and enhanced outcomes were observed. In this
study, we demonstrated that Good Prognosis patients would also benefit
from inclusion of published Acupuncture protocols. This is also the first
publication of Birth outcome data in Acupuncture treated IVF patients.
Acupuncture significantly increased birth outcomes; it significantly decreased
ectopic pregnancies and miscarriage rates. These data uniquely
support a definitive role of both Electrostimulation and Traditional combined
with Auricular Acupuncture in IVF in Good Prognosis IVF patients.
Supported by: None.
|